⚡ 114 MILL RD

Burlington, NJ — Intake Report
📍 39.7891948, -74.8872627 📐 9.78 acres 🏷️ APN: 0313_94_5 🔌 📅 Generated May 08, 2026 09:51 PM 🆔 NJ000712
Go
BESS Score: 76/10 Buildable: 9.06 ac Nearest Sub: BISHOPS (0.937 miles) Zoning: Forest Agriculture
🗺️ Map
📋 Overview
🔍 Diligence
🤖 AI Analysis
📝 Notes

🏠 Property Details

KAREN TOMAZIEFSKI
9.78
0313_94_5
Forest Agriculture (FA)
Battery Energy Storage
Burlington
34005
-

⚡ Infrastructure

BISHOPS
0.937 miles
0 kV kV
500kV at 2.6 mi (NOT AVAILABLE)

🌊 Environmental

Loading...
Loading...
N/A (non-MD)
None within ~3 miles
None within ~2 miles
None
None
None within ~2 miles

💰 IRA/ITC Adders

No
No
No

🏛️ Jurisdiction

Evesham Township
Township
Loading from layers...

📊 Assessment

Go
76/10

🔍 Site Diligence Checklist

Complete these items directly. Changes are saved automatically.

AHJ Confirmed
Verify governing jurisdiction via municipality overlay
Zoning Verified
Confirm BESS-compatible zoning or CUP/SUP pathway
Flood/Wetlands Clear
FEMA Zone X or buildable area avoids flood/wetlands
Site Access Confirmed
Road access, easements, equipment delivery route
Substation Feasibility
Nearest substation capacity and voltage suitable
Setback Analysis
Buildable acreage accounts for required setbacks
Environmental Clear
No endangered species, conservation areas, brownfield issues
Title Clear
No liens, encumbrances, or easement conflicts

📝 Diligence Fields

🤖 AI Site Assessment — Gemini Deep Research

Site Access & Topography

The property at 114 MILL RD, Evesham Township, Burlington County, NJ, presents several unknowns regarding site access and topography. The specific quality of "Road Access" and "POI Access" is currently Unknown, which is a critical data gap. Given the "Forest Agriculture (FA)" zoning, Mill Road could range from a well-maintained paved county road to a narrow, unpaved rural track. This directly impacts equipment delivery feasibility.

For a BESS project, heavy equipment such as transformers, battery containers, and construction machinery requires robust access roads capable of supporting significant weight and width. Without knowing the road quality, it is impossible to definitively assess whether these critical components can access the site. A site visit and review of local road classifications are immediately required.

Regarding terrain characteristics, the "Forest Agriculture" zoning often suggests relatively flat to gently rolling topography, suitable for agricultural use or open space. The reported "Buildable Acres: 9.06" out of "Total Acres: 9.78" is a positive indicator, suggesting a high percentage of the land is developable, implying no extreme slopes or significant natural impediments like large rock formations. However, specific topographical data (e.g., LiDAR, contour maps) is needed to confirm this and plan for grading and drainage.

No information on access easements was provided. This is a standard due diligence item that Requires Verification through a title search and survey to ensure unencumbered access from a public right-of-way. Any existing easements (e.g., utility, drainage) must be identified to ensure they do not conflict with the proposed BESS layout.

Environmental Constraints

Several key environmental constraints remain Unknown for this property, posing significant risks. The "FEMA Flood Zone" designation is unknown, which is a critical gap. If the site is located within a 100-year or 500-year floodplain, it would necessitate elevated equipment, increased civil engineering costs for flood protection, and potentially complex permitting requirements from FEMA and local authorities. This could significantly impact project viability and cost.

Similarly, the presence of "Wetlands" is also Unknown. New Jersey has stringent wetlands regulations (NJDEP). If wetlands are present, they would trigger significant setback requirements, potential mitigation costs, and lengthy permitting processes, severely reducing the effective buildable area and increasing development timelines and costs. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a wetlands delineation are essential next steps.

Positively, the property appears free from several other major environmental concerns. There is "None" listed for "Critical Habitat / Endangered Species," "Brownfield/Superfund" sites within ~2 miles, "Protected Areas," and "Gas Wells Nearby" within ~2 miles. The absence of brownfield status means no IRA brownfield bonus, but also no remediation liabilities. "Pipeline Proximity" is also favorable, with "None within ~3 miles," eliminating safety setbacks and associated risks. The "Chesapeake Bay Critical Area" is "N/A (non-MD)," so this specific regulation does not apply.

Grid Infrastructure & Interconnection

The grid infrastructure presents a mixed bag of potential and critical unknowns. The "Nearest Substation: BISHOPS" is an excellent distance at only 0.937 miles. This proximity is highly favorable for reducing interconnection costs and construction timelines. However, the "Max Voltage: 0 kV kV" for this substation is a critical data gap. Without knowing the operating voltage (e.g., 13kV, 34.5kV, 69kV), it's impossible to assess its suitability for a BESS project or the likely interconnection voltage.

The "Nearest Transmission Line: 500kV at 2.6 mi" is noted as "NOT AVAILABLE," indicating that a transmission-level interconnection is likely not feasible or practical for this project, especially for a distribution-scale BESS (≤5MW). Therefore, the likely interconnection voltage will be at the distribution level, assuming the BISHOPS substation supports this.

Given the close proximity to the substation, if it has available capacity at a suitable distribution voltage, the interconnection cost range could be moderate, potentially in the $500k - $1.5M range for a 5MW project, primarily covering a short gen-tie line and substation upgrades. However, this is highly speculative without voltage and capacity data. The interconnection timeline, being in PJM territory (likely served by PSE&G or Atlantic City Electric), can be lengthy, typically 18-36 months for distribution-scale projects, depending on the utility's specific queue and study processes.

The utility-specific interconnection (IX) process and typical queue times for the specific utility serving Evesham Township (PSE&G or ACE) Requires Verification. PJM's regional queue is known for its complexity and duration, though distribution-level projects sometimes follow a more streamlined local utility process. Identifying the likely feeder configuration (e.g., radial, networked, available capacity) from the BISHOPS substation is also a critical next step.

Regulatory & Zoning Analysis

The "Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)" is Evesham Township, Burlington County, NJ. This is a local municipal AHJ, meaning local zoning ordinances will be paramount.

The current zoning is "Forest Agriculture (Code: FA)." This zoning designation is a significant red flag for BESS compatibility. FA zones are typically intended for agricultural preservation, open space, and very low-density residential uses. Battery Energy Storage Systems are generally classified as industrial or utility uses, which are rarely permitted by-right in FA zones.

Therefore, the recommended permitting pathway is highly unlikely to be "by-right." It will almost certainly require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or Special Use Permit (SUP), or potentially a variance if BESS is not explicitly listed as a permitted conditional use. This pathway involves extensive public hearings, discretionary approval by the planning board or zoning board of adjustment, and potentially significant community opposition. This process is typically lengthy, costly, and carries a higher risk of denial.

Known setback requirements for BESS in Evesham Township are Unknown and Require Verification. Local ordinances may specify setbacks from property lines, residential structures, public roads, and environmentally sensitive areas. New Jersey has evolving state-level guidance for BESS, but local zoning remains the primary determinant. There is no information provided regarding any moratoriums or restrictions on BESS projects in Evesham Township, but this is a risk that Requires Verification, as many municipalities are enacting such measures due to safety concerns or lack of specific zoning.

IRA/ITC Incentive Analysis

Based on the provided data, the property does not qualify for any of the major IRA/ITC adders, which significantly limits the potential for enhanced investment tax credits.

  • Opportunity Zone eligibility: The property is designated as "No" for Opportunity Zone eligibility. This means no additional ITC adder from this category.
  • Energy Community status: The property is designated as "No" for Energy Community status. This eliminates the potential 10% ITC adder for projects located in areas with significant fossil fuel employment or closures.
  • Low-Income Community qualification: The property is designated as "No" for Low-Income Community qualification. This means it does not qualify for the 10% or 20% ITC adder available for projects serving low-income communities.

Given these factors, the potential cumulative ITC adder percentage is 0%. The project would only qualify for the base 30% ITC (assuming prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements are met). This represents a missed opportunity to significantly enhance project economics through federal incentives.

BESS Score & Rationale

BESS Suitability Score: 52/100

  • Location (10/20): The location benefits from good proximity to a substation (0.937 miles). However, the "Forest Agriculture" zoning is a significant negative, indicating a challenging permitting pathway. Road access quality is unknown, which is a critical buildability factor.
  • Grid Access (15/25): Excellent proximity to the BISHOPS substation is a major advantage. However, the "Max Voltage: 0 kV kV" is a critical unknown, making it impossible to confirm the substation's suitability or available capacity. The nearest transmission line is not available. This uncertainty heavily discounts the score despite the good distance.
  • Environmental (8/15): No critical habitat, brownfield, or pipeline proximity is positive. However, the "Unknown" status for FEMA Flood Zone and Wetlands are major red flags that introduce significant risk, potential cost, and permitting delays.
  • Regulatory (5/15): The "Forest Agriculture" zoning is a severe impediment. A by-right pathway is highly unlikely, requiring a complex and risky Conditional Use Permit or Special Use Permit process. Unknown setback requirements and potential moratorium risks further depress this score.
  • Incentives (5/15): The project does not qualify for any IRA/ITC adders (Opportunity Zone, Energy Community, Low-Income Community). This means only the base 30% ITC is available, missing out on significant economic uplift.
  • Buildability (9/10): The "Buildable Acres: 9.06" out of 9.78 is very good, suggesting a relatively unconstrained site in terms of physical layout. However, unknown topography, road access, and potential environmental constraints (wetlands, flood zone) could impact this. The score reflects the high percentage of buildable land, but acknowledges the unknowns.

Key Risks & Mitigants

  1. Zoning Incompatibility & Permitting Difficulty: The "Forest Agriculture" zoning is highly unlikely to permit BESS by-right. This will necessitate a lengthy, costly, and uncertain Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or Special Use Permit (SUP) process, with high risk of community opposition and denial.
    • Mitigant: Engage a local land use attorney immediately to assess Evesham Township's specific ordinances regarding BESS or similar utility uses in FA zones. Conduct preliminary outreach to the planning department to gauge receptiveness and identify potential pathways or necessary zoning amendments. Prepare for extensive public outreach and community engagement.
  2. Substation Voltage & Capacity Unknown: The "Max

📸 Satellite Inspection

Satellite Close-up
Close-up (Zoom 17)
Satellite Wide
Context View (Zoom 14)
Terrain Map
Terrain / Roads

📝 Add Note

📋 Note History

No notes yet. Add the first note above.