⚡ 142 E MAIN ST

Bristol County, MA — Intake Report
📍 41.9766497, -71.1700269 📐 2.78 acres 🏷️ APN: 218 17_62_0 🔌 📅 Generated June 26, 2026 09:22 AM 🆔 MA004824
BESS Score: /10 Buildable: ac Nearest Sub: UNKNOWN136320 (1.4 mi) Zoning: Commercial (Retail) - Commercial (General)
🗺️ Map
📐 Site Layout
📋 Overview
🤖 AI Analysis
📝 Notes

🔍 Site Diligence

Complete these items. Changes save automatically.
AHJ Confirmed
Verify governing jurisdiction via municipality overlay
Zoning Verified
Confirm BESS-compatible zoning or CUP/SUP pathway
Flood/Wetlands Clear
FEMA Zone X or buildable area avoids flood/wetlands
Site Access Confirmed
Road access, easements, equipment delivery route
Substation Feasibility
Nearest substation capacity and voltage suitable
Setback Analysis
Buildable acreage accounts for required setbacks
Environmental Clear
No endangered species, conservation areas, brownfield issues
Title Clear
No liens, encumbrances, or easement conflicts

📝 Diligence Fields

🏠 Property Details

JLM MARTINS REALTY TRUST
2.78
218 17_62_0
Commercial (Retail) - Commercial (General) (R60)
Bristol County
25005
-

⚡ Infrastructure

UNKNOWN136320
1.4 mi
-999999 kV
115kV at 3.7 mi (NOT AVAILABLE)
91 ft
Not prime farmland
🔴 273 structures within 0.5 mi (setback/opposition risk)

🌊 Environmental

Loading...
Loading...
N/A (non-MD)
None within ~3 miles
None within ~2 miles
None
None
None within ~2 miles

💰 IRA/ITC Adders

No
No
No

🏛️ Jurisdiction

Norton

📊 Assessment

/10

🤖 AI Site Assessment — Gemini Deep Research

1. Site Access & Topography

The subject property at 142 E Main St, Norton, MA, appears to have direct frontage on East Main Street (MA Route 123), a primary local thoroughfare. Based on aerial imagery analysis, this road is a two-lane, paved public road capable of supporting standard commercial traffic. Feasibility for heavy equipment delivery, including flatbed trucks for battery containers, medium-duty cranes for placement, and trucks for transformers and switchgear, appears high. The primary access point would be directly from East Main Street onto the parcel.

The topography in this region of Bristol County is generally flat to gently rolling. The parcel itself appears relatively level, which is highly advantageous for BESS development as it minimizes the need for extensive civil work and grading, thereby reducing site preparation costs. The current land use appears to be undeveloped or sparsely vegetated, further simplifying construction.

A key consideration is the internal site layout. While the parcel has road frontage, the final BESS array location will require an internal gravel or paved access road capable of supporting the weight of a crane and fully loaded delivery trucks. Given the parcel size of 2.78 acres, creating this internal access should be feasible without encroaching on required setbacks. No off-site access easements appear necessary, as the property directly abuts a public right-of-way. However, a formal survey will be required to confirm property lines and ensure no existing utility or access easements encumber the proposed development area.

2. Environmental Constraints

Environmental due diligence reveals several critical unknowns that represent significant project risk.

  • FEMA Flood Zone: The flood zone designation is listed as "Unknown." This is a critical data gap. A preliminary desktop review using the FEMA Flood Map Service Center suggests the property is likely within Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard. However, this Requires Verification through a formal report. If any portion of the site falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area (e.g., Zone A or AE), development would be severely restricted or require costly mitigation, such as elevating all equipment above the Base Flood Elevation.
  • Wetlands: The presence of wetlands is "Unknown." Massachusetts has extremely stringent wetland protection regulations under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (WPA). Any development within 100 feet of a designated wetland (the "Buffer Zone") is subject to review and approval by the Norton Conservation Commission. The presence of even a small, isolated wetland could render a significant portion of this 2.78-acre parcel undevelopable for a BESS project. A formal Wetlands Delineation by a certified professional is an immediate and critical next step.
  • Critical Habitat / Species: The data indicates no critical habitat or protected areas on site. This is a positive finding, but it should be verified through a check of the Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP) database to ensure no state-listed rare species or priority habitats are present.
  • Brownfield/Superfund Status: The site is not a brownfield and is not proximate to any Superfund sites. While this eliminates the potential for the 10% IRA brownfield tax credit adder, it is a net positive from a risk and liability perspective, avoiding potential soil contamination and remediation costs.
  • Pipeline Proximity: The absence of major gas pipelines within a three-mile radius is a significant safety and layout advantage, eliminating concerns related to pipeline operator-mandated setbacks and explosion risks.

3. Grid Infrastructure & Interconnection

The viability of this site is heavily dependent on the cost and feasibility of interconnection. The provided data is incomplete and contains errors, requiring immediate investigation.

  • Nearest Substation: The data identifies "UNKNOWN136320" at a distance of 1.4 miles. The voltage is erroneous (-999999 kV). Assuming this is a standard distribution substation, the interconnecting utility is likely National Grid, which serves the Town of Norton. A 1.4-mile distance is significant for a distribution-scale project and will likely require a new dedicated feeder extension.
  • Transmission Access: A 115kV transmission line is located 3.7 miles away. This distance makes a transmission-level interconnection economically unfeasible for a project of this scale (≤5MW). Therefore, the only viable path is a distribution-level interconnection.
  • Recommended Interconnection: The project should target an interconnection to a local 13.8 kV distribution circuit, which is a common voltage for National Grid in this area. The likely Point of Interconnection (POI) would be on the existing overhead distribution poles along East Main Street.
  • Estimated Costs & Timeline: A 1.4-mile, 3-phase distribution line extension could range from $750,000 to over $2.5 million, depending on whether it is overhead or underground, pole replacement requirements, and any necessary upstream substation upgrades. This cost represents a major risk to the project's financial viability. The interconnection process in Massachusetts, which falls under ISO New England (ISO-NE), is notoriously slow. A realistic timeline from application submission to commercial operation could be 24-36 months, assuming the feeder has available capacity.
  • Utility Process: The project would need to enter National Grid's interconnection queue. A formal pre-application is essential to determine feeder capacity, obtain a non-binding cost estimate, and identify any potential system constraints. The capacity of the local feeder is a major unknown; it may not be able to accommodate 5MW of new generation/load without significant and costly upgrades.

4. Regulatory & Zoning Analysis

The regulatory pathway in Norton presents a high degree of uncertainty and risk.

  • Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ): The Town of Norton is the primary AHJ, with permitting authority resting with the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), and Conservation Commission.

📸 Satellite Inspection

Satellite Close-up
Close-up (Zoom 17)
Satellite Wide
Context View (Zoom 14)
Terrain Map
Terrain / Roads

📝 Add Note

📋 Note History

No notes yet. Add the first note above.