⚡ ASHBURNHAM HILL RD

Worcester County, MA — Intake Report
📍 42.5926675, -71.8266225 📐 11.63 acres 🏷️ APN: 097 87R-28-A 🔌 📅 Generated July 01, 2026 04:14 PM 🆔 MA001382
BESS Score: /10 Buildable: ac Nearest Sub: RIVER STREET (1.0 mi) Zoning: Vacant Land - Residential-Vacant Land
🗺️ Map
📐 Site Layout
📋 Overview
🤖 AI Analysis
📝 Notes

🔍 Site Diligence

Complete these items. Changes save automatically.
AHJ Confirmed
Verify governing jurisdiction via municipality overlay
Zoning Verified
Confirm BESS-compatible zoning or CUP/SUP pathway
Flood/Wetlands Clear
FEMA Zone X or buildable area avoids flood/wetlands
Site Access Confirmed
Road access, easements, equipment delivery route
Substation Feasibility
Nearest substation capacity and voltage suitable
Setback Analysis
Buildable acreage accounts for required setbacks
Environmental Clear
No endangered species, conservation areas, brownfield issues
Title Clear
No liens, encumbrances, or easement conflicts

📝 Diligence Fields

🏠 Property Details

LANZILOTTI, CODY P.
11.63
097 87R-28-A
Vacant Land - Residential-Vacant Land (RR)
Worcester County
25027
-

⚡ Infrastructure

RIVER STREET
1.0 mi
-999999 kV
115kV at 2.6 mi (FITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY)
748 ft
Not prime farmland
🔴 159 structures within 0.5 mi (setback/opposition risk)

🌊 Environmental

Loading...
Loading...
N/A (non-MD)
None within ~3 miles
None within ~2 miles
None
None
24 site(s) within ~2 mi

💰 IRA/ITC Adders

No
No
No

🏛️ Jurisdiction

Fitchburg

📊 Assessment

/10

🤖 AI Site Assessment — Gemini Deep Research

1. Site Access & Topography

The subject property is located on Ashburnham Hill Road in Fitchburg, MA. Initial desktop analysis using satellite and street-level imagery suggests that Ashburnham Hill Road is a two-lane, paved local road. However, its width, shoulder condition, and weight limits are unknown and require verification. The name "Hill Road" strongly implies challenging topography. A review of topographic maps confirms this, indicating rolling to steep hills in the immediate vicinity. This presents a significant risk for civil engineering costs, as extensive grading and site leveling would likely be required to create a suitable pad for BESS containers and associated equipment.

Feasibility for heavy equipment delivery is a primary concern. The delivery of multi-ton transformers and 40-53 foot battery containers requires roads with adequate turning radii, minimal grades (typically under 6-8%), and no restrictive overhead obstructions or bridges with low weight ratings. A formal route survey is essential to confirm that a lowboy trailer can navigate from the nearest state highway to the site entrance. Furthermore, the parcel appears to have limited road frontage and the exact point of legal access is unclear. It is critical to verify that the property is not landlocked and possesses a legally deeded, insurable access easement of sufficient width to support construction traffic. Without this, the site is non-viable.

2. Environmental Constraints

The environmental profile of this site presents several critical unknowns that must be resolved. The FEMA Flood Zone designation is currently unknown. Any location within a 100-year floodplain (e.g., Zone AE) would introduce substantial design complexity and cost, requiring all equipment to be elevated above the Base Flood Elevation, or could render the site undevelopable. Similarly, the presence of wetlands is unknown. Massachusetts has stringent wetland protection laws, and the presence of state or federally regulated wetlands would trigger significant setback requirements (typically 100 feet or more), potentially reducing the buildable area to an unworkable size. A desktop screening followed by a formal wetlands delineation is a mandatory next step.

On a positive note, the site is not within a designated Critical Habitat or Protected Area, and no pipelines are in the immediate vicinity, reducing some risk. However, the data indicates 24 brownfield or superfund sites within a two-mile radius. This suggests a history of industrial land use in the area and elevates the risk of on-site contamination. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is non-negotiable to establish an innocent landowner defense and to identify any Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs). This high density of nearby sites also presents an opportunity: if the subject parcel itself can be classified as a brownfield (e.g., due to historical dumping or contamination), it could qualify for the 10% Brownfield ITC adder under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This potential upside warrants the cost of the Phase I ESA.

3. Grid Infrastructure & Interconnection

The site is located approximately 1.0 mile from the RIVER STREET substation. This is a favorable distance for a distribution-scale project. The utility is presumed to be Fitchburg Gas & Electric, a subsidiary of Unitil, but this requires confirmation. The provided substation voltage data (-999999 kV) is erroneous and must be investigated; the distribution voltage is likely in the 13.8kV class, which would be the recommended interconnection voltage. A 5MW BESS is too small to justify the cost of a 2.6-mile interconnection to the nearest 115kV transmission line.

The primary challenge will be the cost and timeline of the 1-mile distribution line extension. This will require new poles, conductors, and potentially road or property crossings. A rough order-of-magnitude cost for such a line is estimated at $1.5M - $2.5M, though this can vary widely based on terrain and existing infrastructure. The project would need to enter the ISO-New England (ISO-NE) interconnection queue, which is notoriously congested and complex. A realistic timeline from application submission to Commercial Operation could be 30-48 months. A critical early step is to submit a pre-application report request to Unitil to determine if the feeder originating from the River Street substation has sufficient hosting capacity for 5MW of injection and to get a preliminary, non-binding cost estimate for the required upgrades.

4. Regulatory & Zoning Analysis

This is the most significant challenge for the project. The Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) is the City of Fitchburg. The property is zoned RR (Residential-Vacant Land). This zoning is fundamentally incompatible with a utility-scale BESS, which is an industrial use. A BESS project is not a by-right use in any residential zone.

The permitting pathway will be arduous and carries a high risk of failure. The project would likely require, at a minimum, a Special Permit from the Planning Board or a Use Variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). A Use Variance is exceptionally difficult to obtain in Massachusetts, as it requires proving a unique hardship related to the land itself. Community opposition from nearby residential abutters is almost guaranteed and will be a major factor for the permitting boards. We must immediately research Fitchburg's zoning bylaws

📸 Satellite Inspection

Satellite Close-up
Close-up (Zoom 17)
Satellite Wide
Context View (Zoom 14)
Terrain Map
Terrain / Roads

📝 Add Note

📋 Note History

No notes yet. Add the first note above.