⚡ 40 MILLBURY RD

Worcester County, MA — Intake Report
📍 42.1467663, -71.853093 📐 12.58 acres 🏷️ APN: 226 16_D03 🔌 📅 Generated July 03, 2026 02:36 PM 🆔 MA001367
BESS Score: /10 Buildable: ac Nearest Sub: NORTH OXFORD (1.5 mi) Zoning: Vacant Land - Private Preserve, Open Space-Vacant Land (Forest L
🗺️ Map
📐 Site Layout
📋 Overview
🤖 AI Analysis
📝 Notes

🔍 Site Diligence

Complete these items. Changes save automatically.
AHJ Confirmed
Verify governing jurisdiction via municipality overlay
Zoning Verified
Confirm BESS-compatible zoning or CUP/SUP pathway
Flood/Wetlands Clear
FEMA Zone X or buildable area avoids flood/wetlands
Site Access Confirmed
Road access, easements, equipment delivery route
Substation Feasibility
Nearest substation capacity and voltage suitable
Setback Analysis
Buildable acreage accounts for required setbacks
Environmental Clear
No endangered species, conservation areas, brownfield issues
Title Clear
No liens, encumbrances, or easement conflicts

📝 Diligence Fields

🏠 Property Details

EAMES, D EDWIN
12.58
226 16_D03
Vacant Land - Private Preserve, Open Space-Vacant Land (Forest L (R1)
Worcester County
25027
-

⚡ Infrastructure

NORTH OXFORD
1.5 mi
115 kV
345kV at 0.9 mi (FITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY)
632 ft
Not prime farmland
🔴 99 structures within 0.5 mi (setback/opposition risk)

🌊 Environmental

Loading...
Loading...
N/A (non-MD)
None within ~3 miles
None within ~2 miles
None
None
None within ~2 miles

💰 IRA/ITC Adders

No
No
No

🏛️ Jurisdiction

Oxford

📊 Assessment

/10

🤖 AI Site Assessment — Gemini Deep Research

1. Site Access & Topography

The subject property at 40 Millbury Road in Oxford, MA, presents several access and topographical challenges that require immediate investigation. Millbury Road appears to be a two-lane, paved local road, which should generally support truck traffic. However, a detailed route survey is required to confirm the absence of low-clearance bridges, sharp turns, or weight-restricted infrastructure between major highways and the site entrance. The primary concern is the parcel's current state as "Forest Land." This indicates the site is likely undeveloped, heavily wooded, and lacks an existing improved access road from Millbury Road to a potential project area within the 12.58-acre parcel.

The topography is likely uneven, consistent with forested areas in Worcester County, potentially featuring slopes, rock outcroppings, and varied terrain. A full topographical survey will be essential to determine the extent of civil work required. Significant clearing, grubbing, and grading will be necessary to create a level pad for the BESS compound, lay-down areas, and an internal access road. The feasibility of delivering heavy equipment, such as a 100-ton crane for setting transformers and the BESS containers themselves, is contingent on constructing a new, stable access road capable of supporting such loads. This represents a significant upfront civil engineering cost and construction timeline risk. Furthermore, an access easement from the public right-of-way (Millbury Rd) to the project footprint must be legally verified through a title search to ensure unencumbered, permanent access for construction and long-term operations and maintenance.

2. Environmental Constraints

The environmental profile of this site contains critical unknowns that pose a potential "fatal flaw" risk.

  • FEMA Flood Zone: The flood zone designation is currently unknown. This requires immediate verification. If any portion of the planned development area falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area (e.g., Zone A, AE), it could render the site undevelopable or require costly mitigation measures like elevating all equipment above the Base Flood Elevation, significantly impacting project economics.
  • Wetlands: The presence of wetlands is also unknown but highly probable on a forested parcel in Massachusetts. A wetlands delineation by a certified professional is a mandatory next step. Development will be subject to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and local Oxford Conservation Commission bylaws, which typically enforce 100-foot buffer zones (and sometimes 200-foot riverfront areas) where development is heavily restricted. The presence of significant wetlands could severely limit the buildable acreage.
  • Habitat & Species: The data indicates no critical habitat, which is a positive initial screen. However, this must be verified by consulting the Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP) database to ensure no state-listed rare species or priority habitats are present, which could trigger lengthy and complex environmental reviews.
  • Brownfield/Superfund: The absence of nearby brownfield or superfund sites is positive from a liability and cleanup cost perspective. However, it also means the project is ineligible for the 10% IRA Brownfield Adder, a notable financial disadvantage.
  • Pipelines: No major pipelines nearby is a significant safety and layout advantage, eliminating setback requirements and potential co-location risks.

3. Grid Infrastructure & Interconnection

Grid access is a major challenge for this site. The nearest substation, North Oxford, is 1.5 miles away. While it has a robust 115 kV bus, a direct 115 kV interconnection is not economically or technically feasible for a distribution-scale (≤5MW) project. The likely interconnection pathway would be to a 3-phase distribution feeder, typically operating at 13.8 kV in this region. The critical unknown is the location, capacity, and voltage of the nearest distribution feeder emanating from the North Oxford substation.

A 1.5-mile line extension for a new distribution feeder would be prohibitively expensive, likely costing between $1.5M and $3.0M, depending on terrain, pole requirements, and road crossings. This cost alone could make the project financially unviable. The 345kV transmission line at 0.9 miles is not a viable Point of Interconnection (POI) for a project of this scale. The interconnecting utility is presumed to be National Grid, but this Requires Verification. The interconnection process would be governed by National Grid and the ISO New England (ISO-NE) tariff. ISO-NE's interconnection queue is notoriously long and complex, with timelines for study and approval often exceeding 24-36 months. A formal interconnection application is necessary to determine the exact POI, available capacity on the feeder, and the scope and cost of required system upgrades. Without a viable, nearby distribution feeder, this site is not feasible.

4. Regulatory & Zoning Analysis

The regulatory pathway presents the most significant risk for this project. The Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) is the Town of Oxford. The parcel's zoning is listed as R-1 (Residential) and "Private Preserve, Open Space-Vacant Land." Battery energy storage is an industrial/utility use and is fundamentally incompatible with these zoning designations. It is almost certain that BESS is not a permitted use "by-right."

Therefore, the only potential permitting pathway would be through a discretionary process, such as a Use Variance or possibly a Special Permit from the Oxford Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). This process is high-risk, costly, time-consuming, and has no guarantee of success. It would require extensive public hearings and is highly susceptible to local opposition ("NIMBYism"), particularly from residents in an R-1 zone. We must immediately review the Town of Oxford's Zoning Bylaws to see if "public utility" or "energy facility" uses are contemplated under a special permit process in any zone. Many Massachusetts towns have enacted or are considering moratoriums on BESS

📸 Satellite Inspection

Satellite Close-up
Close-up (Zoom 17)
Satellite Wide
Context View (Zoom 14)
Terrain Map
Terrain / Roads

📝 Add Note

📋 Note History

No notes yet. Add the first note above.