⚡ 400 S RAILROAD ST

Jo Daviess, IL — Intake Report
📍 42.4917794, -89.9818219 📐 10.02 acres 🏷️ APN: 21-001-692-03 🔌 ComEd (Exelon) — IOU 📅 Generated May 12, 2026 12:48 PM 🆔 IL000004
Go
BESS Score: /10 Buildable: ac Nearest Sub: UNKNOWN136979 (0.1 mi) Zoning: Industrial (General) - Industrial (General)
🗺️ Map
📐 Site Layout
📋 Overview
🤖 AI Analysis
📝 Notes

🔍 Site Diligence

Complete these items. Changes save automatically.
AHJ Confirmed
Verify governing jurisdiction via municipality overlay
Zoning Verified
Confirm BESS-compatible zoning or CUP/SUP pathway
Flood/Wetlands Clear
FEMA Zone X or buildable area avoids flood/wetlands
Site Access Confirmed
Road access, easements, equipment delivery route
Substation Feasibility
Nearest substation capacity and voltage suitable
Setback Analysis
Buildable acreage accounts for required setbacks
Environmental Clear
No endangered species, conservation areas, brownfield issues
Title Clear
No liens, encumbrances, or easement conflicts

📝 Diligence Fields

🏠 Property Details

WPPO LLC
10.02
21-001-692-03
Industrial (General) - Industrial (General) (-)
Jo Daviess
17085
S19 T29N R5E JOHNSON'S ADD PT E 12 W 12 SW

⚡ Infrastructure

ComEd (Exelon) — IOU
12.47kV (est. ComEd distribution)
UNKNOWN136979
0.1 mi
-999999 kV
None within ~3 miles

🌊 Environmental

Loading...
Loading...
N/A (non-MD)
None within ~3 miles
None within ~2 miles
None
None
None within ~2 miles

💰 IRA/ITC Adders

No
Yes — Fossil Fuel Employment (FFE Area)
No

🏛️ Jurisdiction

Loading from layers...

📊 Assessment

Go
/10

🤖 AI Site Assessment — Gemini Deep Research

Site Access & Topography

The property at 400 S RAILROAD ST, Warren, Jo Daviess County, IL, is located in an area zoned Industrial (General), which typically implies good existing infrastructure for heavy industrial use. The address itself, "S RAILROAD ST," suggests proximity to a rail line, often associated with flat or gently sloping terrain suitable for industrial development. However, specific data for "Road Access" and "POI Access" are currently Unknown. This is a critical gap.

Based on the Industrial zoning, it is highly probable that heavy equipment, such as transformers, battery containers, and construction vehicles, can access the site. Industrial zones are generally designed with robust road networks capable of supporting such loads. However, without explicit confirmation of road quality (e.g., paved, gravel, weight limits) and direct site access points, this remains an assumption. A detailed site visit and review of local road maps are essential. There is no information regarding existing access easements, which would need to be verified during due diligence to ensure unencumbered access for construction and long-term operations.

  • Actionable Insight: Conduct a physical site visit to assess road quality, existing access points, and general terrain. Verify any potential access easements or requirements with the property owner and local planning department.
  • Feasibility: Likely feasible for heavy equipment, but requires immediate verification of road quality and direct site access.

Environmental Constraints

Several critical environmental factors for this site are currently Unknown. The "FEMA Flood Zone" designation is a significant gap; BESS installations in flood zones (e.g., AE, VE) can incur substantial additional costs for elevated foundations, floodproofing, and increased permitting complexity, or even render a site unbuildable. Similarly, the presence of "Wetlands" is Unknown. If wetlands are present, federal (USACE) and state (IEPA) regulations would mandate costly delineation, mitigation, and setback requirements, potentially reducing buildable area and extending permitting timelines.

Positively, the data indicates "Critical Habitat: None," "Protected Areas: None," "Brownfield/Superfund: None within ~2 miles," and "Pipeline Proximity: None within ~3 miles." This eliminates several major environmental risks and simplifies the permitting process by avoiding complex consultations or safety setbacks. The absence of brownfield status means no associated cleanup costs, but also no IRA brownfield bonus. "Chesapeake Bay Critical Area" is correctly noted as N/A, as the site is in Illinois. "Gas Wells Nearby: None within ~2 miles" also removes a potential safety and setback concern.

  • Actionable Insight: Immediately commission a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to identify potential contaminants, and specifically request a FEMA flood zone determination and a preliminary wetland delineation.
  • Implications: High risk due to unknowns; potential for significant cost increases or project infeasibility if flood zones or extensive wetlands are present.

Grid Infrastructure & Interconnection

The site's grid infrastructure presents a compelling opportunity. The "Nearest Substation: UNKNOWN136979" is an exceptional 0.1 miles away. While the "Max Voltage: -999999 kV" is clearly bad data, the "IX Voltage: 12.47kV (est. ComEd distribution)" strongly indicates a distribution-level interconnection with ComEd (Exelon), a major Investor-Owned Utility (IOU). The absence of a "Nearest Transmission Line" within 3 miles further confirms a distribution-scale project.

Given the 0.1-mile distance to the substation, the likely interconnection voltage will be 12.47kV. This proximity is a significant advantage, as it typically minimizes line extension costs and can reduce construction timelines for the interconnection facilities. However, ComEd's interconnection queue is known to be lengthy and competitive, often requiring 18-36 months for distribution-level projects to navigate the study process (Feasibility, System Impact, Facilities). The available capacity at the substation is Unknown and will be a critical factor in the interconnection study. The likely feeder configuration is also Unknown, but proximity to a substation usually implies a robust feeder with potentially higher capacity.

  • Actionable Insight: Initiate a pre-application meeting with ComEd to discuss substation capacity, feeder availability, and typical interconnection study timelines for the Warren area. Prepare to submit a formal interconnection request promptly.
  • Estimated Interconnection Cost/Timeline: Cost range could be $500k - $2M, primarily driven by substation upgrades rather than line extension. Timeline is likely 18-36 months for studies, plus 6-12 months for construction.

Regulatory & Zoning Analysis

The Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) for this property is the Municipality of Warren, Jo Daviess County, IL. The current zoning is "Industrial (General)" (Code: I-1), which is highly favorable for BESS development. Industrial zoning districts are typically designed to accommodate heavy industrial uses, including energy infrastructure, and often have fewer aesthetic or noise restrictions compared to residential or commercial zones.

For BESS compatibility, Industrial zoning often allows such facilities either "by-right" or with a "Conditional Use Permit (CUP)" or "Special Use Permit (SUP)." By-right is the most straightforward pathway, while a CUP/SUP would require a public hearing and demonstration of compliance with specific conditions (e.g., setbacks, screening, noise limits). Given the industrial context, a CUP/SUP is a likely and manageable permitting pathway if not by-right. Specific setback requirements for BESS in Warren or Jo Daviess County are Unknown and must be verified. Illinois does not have statewide BESS-specific zoning, deferring to local jurisdictions. There are no known moratorium or restriction risks, but this requires direct inquiry with the Warren planning department.

  • Actionable Insight: Review the Warren and Jo Daviess County zoning ordinances thoroughly for specific BESS definitions, permitted uses in I-1 zones, and any applicable setback, noise, or screening requirements. Schedule a pre-application meeting with the Warren planning department.
  • Permitting Pathway Recommendation: Target "by-right" if possible; otherwise, anticipate a "Conditional Use Permit (CUP)" or "Special Use Permit (SUP)" process.

IRA/ITC Incentive Analysis

The site's eligibility for Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) Investment Tax Credit (ITC) adders is a key financial consideration.

  • Opportunity Zone Eligibility: The property is designated "No" for Opportunity Zone eligibility, meaning no additional 10% ITC adder from this category.
  • Energy Community Status: The property is designated "Yes — Fossil Fuel Employment (FFE Area)" for Energy Community status. This qualifies the project for a 10% ITC adder. This is a significant boost to project economics.
  • Low-Income Community Qualification: The property is designated "No" for Low-Income Community qualification, meaning no additional 10% or 20% ITC adder from this category.

Based on this analysis, the project is eligible for a 10% cumulative ITC adder due to its location within an Energy Community. Assuming the base ITC is 30%, this brings the total potential ITC to 40% of eligible project costs. This is a strong positive for project financial viability.

BESS Score & Rationale

BESS Suitability Score: 68/100

  • Location (15/20):
    • Rationale: Industrial zoning is highly favorable, suggesting compatibility with BESS operations and fewer community objections. The small town setting (Warren, IL) may offer a more streamlined local permitting process compared to dense urban or highly sensitive rural areas. However, "Road Access" and "POI Access" are unknown, which introduces some uncertainty regarding buildability.
  • Grid Access (20/25):
    • Rationale: Exceptional proximity (0.1 mi) to a substation is a major advantage, significantly reducing interconnection costs and line extension requirements. Interconnecting Utility (ComEd) is a known IOU. The 12.47kV distribution voltage is suitable for distribution-scale BESS. The primary detractor is the unknown substation capacity and ComEd's typically lengthy interconnection queue, which can add significant time and risk.
  • Environmental (5/15):
    • Rationale: While the absence of critical habitat, superfund sites, pipelines, and gas wells is positive, the Unknown status of FEMA Flood Zone and Wetlands is a severe concern. These unknowns represent high-impact risks that could significantly increase costs, delay permitting, or even render the site unbuildable. This score reflects the high uncertainty.
  • Regulatory (10/15):
    • Rationale: Industrial (General) zoning is a strong positive, making BESS likely permissible (by-right or via CUP/SUP). The AHJ is a municipality, which can sometimes be more predictable than county-level. However, specific BESS setback requirements and any local moratoriums are Unknown, introducing moderate risk.
  • Incentives (10/15):
    • Rationale: Qualification as an Energy Community (FFE Area) for a 10% ITC adder is a significant financial benefit. The lack of Opportunity Zone or Low-Income Community adders means it's not the highest possible incentive stack, but still very strong.
  • Buildability (8/10):
    • Rationale: Industrial zoning generally implies flat, developable land with good access. The 10.02 total acres provides ample space for a distribution-scale BESS. However, the "Road Access" and "POI Access" are Unknown, and the "Buildable Acres" is also Unknown, which could be impacted by environmental constraints (wetlands, flood zones) once determined.

Key Risks & Mitigants

  • Risk 1: Environmental Unknowns (FEMA Flood Zone & Wetlands)
    • Description: The lack of data on flood zone designation

📸 Satellite Inspection

Satellite Close-up
Close-up (Zoom 17)
Satellite Wide
Context View (Zoom 14)
Terrain Map
Terrain / Roads

📝 Add Note

📋 Note History

No notes yet. Add the first note above.